| Variable Annuity | Fixed Indexed Annuity | |
| Rollup Rate | 4 – 7% | 4% – 8% |
| Payout % | 5% | 5% – 9% |
| Bonuses | (Generally none) | 0% – 11% |
| Fees | 100bps – 500bps | 0 – 50bps |
This quick comparison shows that in all four areas that can affect a guaranteed payout, the indexed annuity wins in every category. I’ve personally compared dozens of variable annuity riders with indexed products and in every instance that fixed annuity will provide a higher guaranteed income.
Okay, so if you are a variable annuity guy, I know what you are thinking. A variable annuity will out-perform an indexed annuity so that’s how it can provide a higher payout.
I disagree. According to Morningstar the average base VA fees are 1.52%. This does not include the riders. The average income riders with all their features cost on average 2.2%. This brings the total charges to 3.75%. I’ve seen charges as high as 5%. If a variable annuity grossed 9% the net return would only be 5.25%. Most competitive indexed annuities will have income riders that guarantee a 7 – 8% roll up rate. This is why an indexed annuity will always outperform a VA with respect to guaranteed payouts from income riders.
There are also other factors like liquidity options, flexibility to start and stop the income, confinement waivers and income doublers, spousal continuation features and much more that tilt the scale into an indexed annuity’s favor. There isn’t any doubt in my mind as to the reason why income riders on indexed annuities are such a big buzz in the annuity market.

>
>
Post Comment